AAK Hydraulic Valve will change when it knows it's wrong. It only focuses on its

Last time, I mentioned that a hydraulic valve colleague received a very big order for hydraulic cartridge valves. In fact, according to his capacity, even in a specific processing process, he was unable to complete the big order, but he still accepted it. These days, there are problems. First, the delivery date is hard to catch up. Second, there are quality complaints about the delivered hydraulic cartridge valves. Now, he is not only faced with claims, but also with lawsuits.

In fact, this customer also contacted AAK Hydraulic Valve. I calculated that if I accepted this big order, AAK would need to stop the production for cartridge valve orders of other customers. Although this order is large enough, I still gave up. This also reminds me of a development order for SUN hydraulic cartridge valve 5 years ago. One week after the development was started, I found that AAK could not achieve the accuracy of this model. I resolutely stopped and apologized to the customer. Despite the waste of 1 week, SUN hydraulics still sensed that AAK can correct the mistake as soon as we know it.

You and I are ordinary people. To know your mistakes and change them is the most important thing to do after accepting the reality. I think what is being done, if it is wrong, should be stopped as soon as possible. However, most people will speed up their actions after doing something wrong, and then do more wrong things. If they make mistakes, it is more difficult to know and stop loss. There are 2 main reasons:

1. This is too important for me. I can't lose. This is to confuse desire and reality. In the end, we will lose even more.
2. I spent too much effort and money to lose. This is because he did not understand the sunk cost and was kidnapped by the past.

In fact, it is not accurate enough to say "correct when you know your mistakes". Over the years, I have considered that Go, such as AI chess, is not "correct mistakes", but always take the final result as the evaluation standard, and pursue the best hand at present. What is right and wrong? It can only be based on comparison.

1. The ability to evaluate which move is good depends on IQ and foresight;
2. It depends on reason and will to be able to play better chess.

Behind the coherence is our illusion of cause and effect, our greed for "there must be rewards for efforts", our constant dependence on endless time, and our short-sighted vision of the future. Even the best explanation for yourself:

1. "The same thing this time" often becomes the new evidence that "people cannot step into the same river twice";
2. "This time something different" has become the new evidence of "nothing new under the sun".

Hegel said, "The only lesson that mankind has learned from history is that it has not learned any lessons from history." In fact, it is not that people do not accept the lessons, but always feel that those lessons are aimed at other unlucky people, not themselves.